ACQUISITION OF STATE-OWNED ASSETS IN ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS

Resumo

The law in representation of its own nature, changing and evolving, constantly presents the development of new phenomena that end up giving rise to the appearance of new studies on the binding of substantive administrative law and its procedure, in the case of the Peruvian system, the goods State should be classified into two distinct types, the first are the public domain property of the State and secondly we have the property of the state's private domain, the latter being regulated by private law, as it was the property of individuals . However, since in the procedure for acquiring this type of property there are a number of problems in relation to the accreditation of possession in the case of real estate that is in the private domain of the State before 1995, and in addition because it is the same State, which apparently is carrying out various non-transparent mechanisms to accredit projects within said assets that are intended to be acquired either through direct sale or by possession. In addition, the verification of the inspector, who is part of the same administration that intends to adjudicate the property, keeps a force of accreditation of the possessory facts or realization of certain activities that can be performed by those who currently intend to acquire the property of private domain of the State, there is no adequate means of proof that distorts the assertions given by the inspectors who happen to be judge and part in these situations